Did they pick General Motors to buy and save because they wouldn't have to change the signs?
Government Motors and I have heard you cannot fire a government employee, no matter what they do.
Public Comments
- No. They didn't it because neither Party wants to be the ones responsible for letting GM fail - otherwise they'll feel it in the next election.
- Yes!!......Good one!!
- no they saved GM in order to pump money into the unions as repayment for obamas victory
- I thought since they were causing so many people to wanna dive under a bus, that the GM would now stand for "Generates Martyrs". ...
- Yes!!.......Good one!!! Heehheeeeho hoohoh hehehehehehheeeehehehe hoahahohhohha!!!!!!! Yeeeeeeeeehaaaahhhahaaha!!!!!!
- They picked General Motors because it is "too big to fail." Too many people rely on GM for their incomes, including almost all members of the UAW.
- Chrysler was bailed out by the government in 1979/1980. This is GM's first bailout.
- They didn't need a government takeover to keep people from being fired. They UAW makes it impossible to fire anyone which is why among other things the UAW is responsible for the demise of GM and Chrysler as we know them. The UAW is now a welfare agency that just happens to make cars at a loss instead of a profit.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers